Malabar Parota akin to bread, should be taxed at 5%
GST
Kochi: The Kerala High Court has declared that the
‘Malabar Parota’ and the ‘Whole Wheat Malabar Parota’
are akin to ‘bread’ and hence should be taxed at the
rate of 5% GST instead of the previously imposed 18%
GST.
The directive came from the bench of Justice Dinesh
Kumar Singh in response to a petition filed by
Kochi-based Modern Food Enterprises Pvt Ltd seeking the
same relief.
The petition challenged the order of the appellate
authority for Advance Ruling, Kerala, which had
determined that the petitioner’s products, namely
‘Classic Malabar Parota’ and ‘Whole Wheat Malabar Parota,’
were subject to 18% GST as per rate notifications issued
by the Central/State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
The petitioners argued their products fell under the
classification of bread, specifically under the First
Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as Indian
flatbreads were covered by the expression ‘bread’ under
Heading 1905 of the said schedule. They also claimed
exemption rights. The state countered the arguments,
stating that parota did not fit within the description
of bread, branded or otherwise. They argued parota was
distinct from bread and therefore not entitled to the
exemption claimed by the petitioner. The state
emphasized that taxing statutes could not be interpreted
based on presumption or assumption, and bread and parota
were distinguishable goods in both commercial and common
parlance due to differences in ingredients, preparation
process, and baking methods.
|
|
However, the single bench observed that while the most
common ingredients of products falling under Heading
1905 were cereal flours, leavens, and salt, they could
also contain other ingredients such as gluten, starch,
milk, sugar, fats, improvers, etc, like yeast,
sourdough, baking sugar, fats, improvers, etc, like
yeast, sourdough, baking soda, which facilitated
fermentation and improved characteristics and
appearances of the products. The products under this
heading could also be obtained from dough based on the
flour of any cereal. Given that the petitioner’s
products were similar to those mentioned products and
had similar ingredients and preparation processes, the
bench ruled that taxing the petitioner’s products at the
rate of 18% would not be justified and ordered
accordingly.
Source::: THE TIMES OF INDIA,
dated 18/04/2024.
|
|
|
|